首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

浅析《工伤保险条例》第十四条第(六)项规定中“上下班途中”的涵义-析北京国玉大酒店有限公司诉北京市朝阳区劳动和社会保障局工伤认定行政纠纷案
作者单位:《最高人民法院公报》编辑部
摘    要:案情: 陈卫东与北京国玉大酒店有限公司(以下简称国玉酒店公司)签订了书面劳动协议,国玉酒店公司未给陈卫束缴纳工伤保险费,该费用一直由陈卫束下岗时所在的北京馄饨侯餐饮有限责任公司(以下简称馄饨侯公司)负责缴纳。2006年9月20日晨,陈卫束自其住处骑一辆三轮车前往国玉酒店公司上班。

关 键 词:有限责任公司  劳动和社会保障局  北京市朝阳区  《工伤保险条例》  “上下班途中”  酒店  工伤认定  纠纷案

Brief Analysis on the Implications of the Term "the Way to Work" in the Article 16(6) of the "Work-related Injury Insurance Regulations"--Analysis on Beijing Guoyu Hotel Ltd. v. Labor and Social Security Bureau of Chaoyang District of Beijing
Abstract:Chen Weidong and "Beijing Guoyu Hotel Co. Ltd." (hereinafter referred to as "Guoyu Hotel Company") have entered into a written labor agreement, but Guoyu Hotel company did not pay any industrial injury insurance premium for Chen Weidong, and during these years the insurance fees have been continuously paid by "Wonton Hou food limited liability company" (hereinafter referred to as "Wonton Hou company") from which Chen Weidong had been laid off.
Keywords:
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号