法律论证与裁判智慧

法律论证有效性需要依循特定语境,这决定了许多司法裁判实例中都体现出来某种直觉性反思。那么在面对普遍性原则与规范的对应时,发现例外情形表现为一种常态。例外指向的是一种关于规则与论证的可批判性与可反思性,应当给予法律人甚至当事人更多的创造力展现、创新性思维甚至直觉性反思的空间。正如关联原则要求的那样,裁判智慧的关键不仅在于裁决结论依循的原则的普遍性与抽象层次,还在于界分与借助不同原则与理念之间的关系。据此也应该确保规则对多种可能性的容纳。

Legal Argumentation and Wisdom of Judgement

The effectiveness of legal argumentation has to be proved through certain lingual context, which determines that numerous judicial living examples have reflected certain intuitive introspection. Confronted the principle of universality and correspondence of norms, it is ordinary state that exceptions would be founded. The exceptions points to the criticalness and reflexivity about rules and arguments. Then it would be necessary to provide adequate space for the judicial personality and litigants to show their creativity, innovative thinking and even intuitive retrospects. Just like the requirments of principles of relevance, the master key of wisdom of judgements relys not only on universality and level of abstraction of principles followed by the conclusion of judgements, but also on classifying and by virtue of relationship between different principles and ideas. Therefore, the accommodate of multiple possibilities about rules should be ensured.