首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国法律对待口供的应有立场
引用本文:高一飞. 我国法律对待口供的应有立场[J]. 河北法学, 2005, 23(4): 62-67
作者姓名:高一飞
作者单位:西南政法大学,法学院,重庆,400031
摘    要:我国法律应当对现有法律进行完善与改革,对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人口供采取以下立场:合理界定口供,口供只包括供述;应当合法取证,对非法口供应当排除;不能轻信口供,确立口供补强规则;充分使用口供,重视口供扫诉讼功能;废除刑事诉讼法第93条关于如实供述义务的规定,确立沉默权制度。首次全面论述了我国法律对待口供的应有立场,纠正了存在于司法实践中对口供看法上的偏见和片面看法。

关 键 词:口供  非法口供排除规则  口供补强规则  沉默权
文章编号:1002-3933(2005)04-0062-06
修稿时间:2004-11-26

Position as to Confession of the Suspect or the Accused
GAO Yi-fei. Position as to Confession of the Suspect or the Accused[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2005, 23(4): 62-67
Authors:GAO Yi-fei
Abstract:The current litigation on confession should be improved and reformed. We should make clear our position as to confession of the suspect or the accused. Firstly, confession should be defined as statement made by the accused under examination.Secondly, evidence should be collected lawfully. Confession that collected unlawfully should be excluded. Thirdly, we should lay stress on evidence and don't readily believe confessions. At the same time, we should set up the regulation of corroborating evidence. Furthermore, we should abolish article 93 in criminal procedural law, which provided that the accused have the duty of confession. At the same time, we should set up system of right to silence. It is the first time to expound the right way to deal with confession. It is also the first time to redress the bias and one-sided viewpoints on confession in judicial practice.
Keywords:confession  the role of governing illegal confession  the role of corroborating evidence  right to silence
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号