首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

合同诈骗罪认定的困惑--兼谈商法之独立
引用本文:胡东平. 合同诈骗罪认定的困惑--兼谈商法之独立[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报, 2005, 4(3): 55-57
作者姓名:胡东平
作者单位:南昌市人民警察学校,江西,南昌,330103
摘    要:1999年<合同法>颁布后,合同的类型及其订立方式趋于多样化,然而我国立法对<合同法>与<刑法>的协调性关注不够,这给实践中区分合同诈骗罪与诈骗罪带来较大困难.本文试图从民商分立的角度,论述合同诈骗罪与诈骗罪是发生于两个不同领域的犯罪;并从商行为的构成特点入手,为区分两类犯罪提出建议,最终得出商法应独立的主张.

关 键 词:合同诈骗罪  商行为  商法独立  合同诈骗罪  商法  Contract  入手  构成特点  商行为  犯罪  发生  民商分立  实践  协调性  刑法  立法  订立方式  类型  合同法
文章编号:1671-5101(2005)03-0055-03
收稿时间:2005-03-28
修稿时间:2005-03-28

Confusion about the Determination of Crime of Swindling a Contract
Hu Dongping. Confusion about the Determination of Crime of Swindling a Contract[J]. Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Pollce Officers, 2005, 4(3): 55-57
Authors:Hu Dongping
Abstract:After 1999's Law of Contract was issued, the contract's kind has bec ome varied. However, our legislation gives little accordance to Law of Contract and Criminal Law, which brings great difficulty in distinguishing crime of swind ling a contract and crime of swindling. The article, from the angle of the seper ation of civile and commerce, attempts to discuss that they are two different ki nds of crime, and from the character of commercial act, brings out its suggestio n, and finally concludes that the commercial law should be independent.
Keywords:crime of swindling a contract   act of commerce   independent of commercial law
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号