首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Explaining the success and failure of post-communist revolutions
Institution:1. University of Windsor, 167 Ferry St., Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9A 0C5;2. The Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector, Islamic Development Bank, P.O. Box 5925, Jeddah 21432, Saudi Arabia;3. University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9C 4E1;1. Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;2. Imperial College Business School, CEPR and IZA, United Kingdom;3. Ericsson Research, Färögatan 6, Stockholm SE-164 80, Sweden
Abstract:Since 1999, the post-Communist states have seen a series of attempts to overthrow semi-authoritarian governments, with the successful attempts known as the “colored revolutions.” However, not all such attempts have succeeded. This paper seeks to explain the variation in outcomes. Most accounts have focused on the development of grass-roots activist movements. The central argument here is that elites, and in particular security services, play a much more significant role in these revolutions than has generally been appreciated. This hypothesis is elaborated through a threshold model of protest, in which the central question is whether protests achieve a “tipping point” that makes them continue to grow larger until success is inevitable. The actions of elites, it is argued, play a decisive role in whether mass protests reach a tipping point. The argument is examined through a paired comparison of two failed attempts to overthrow governments through street protests (Serbia 1996–1997 and Ukraine 2001) with two successful cases (Serbia 1999 and Ukraine 2004). By studying cases with variation on the dependent variable, this paper seeks to improve the empirical and methodological basis of research on post-communist revolutions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号