首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

试论强制性侦查措施的检察监督机制完善
引用本文:罗海晖. 试论强制性侦查措施的检察监督机制完善[J]. 公安理论与实践, 2011, 0(3): 59-62
作者姓名:罗海晖
作者单位:南京市秦淮区人民检察院,江苏南京210022
摘    要:我国的刑事诉讼模式具有明显的职权主义特征,强制性侦查措施的决定权集权于侦查机关。侦查机关可以还原案件真实的名义以强制的方式对有关人员和单位实施权利上的限制和剥夺,且受到的限制和约束很少,在司法实践中过分强调打击犯罪而忽视人权保障导致实践中侵犯人权的现象时有发生。因此,检察机关作为侦查活动的主要监督者,理应为健全强制性侦查措施的监督机制做出应有的努力。

关 键 词:强制性  侦查措施  监督机制

Perfection of the System of Inspecting and Supervising Mandatory Investigation Measures
Luo Haihui. Perfection of the System of Inspecting and Supervising Mandatory Investigation Measures[J]. Journal of Shanghai Public Security Academy, 2011, 0(3): 59-62
Authors:Luo Haihui
Affiliation:Luo Haihui (Qinhuai People's Procuratoriate of Nanjin,Nanjing210022,Jiangsu)
Abstract:Criminal procedure modes in our country have characteristics of authority principle and the decisions to take mandatory measures are in the hands of investigation agencies.The investigation agencies which may deprive the persons and units concerned of rights or limit their rights by mandatory means under the name of seeking for truthfulness of cases are rarely restricted or bound.In the judicial practice,combating criminals is usually overemphasized and the protection of human rights is ignored so that there often appear such cases of infringing upon human rights.Therefore,procuratoriates as main detection-supervising agencies should make greater efforts to perfect the mechanism of supervising compulsory investigation measures.
Keywords:Compulsory  Investigation Measure  Supervising Mechanism
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号