| 论刑事没收中的举证责任倒置——基于《联合国反腐败公约》第31条的分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高长见. 论刑事没收中的举证责任倒置——基于《联合国反腐败公约》第31条的分析[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2012, 0(5): 100-103 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高长见 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中共中央党校政法部 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在对腐败犯罪所得没收程序中,规定举证责任倒置规则是《联合国反腐败公约》第31条的明确要求。我国新《刑事诉讼法》第280条的违法所得没收程序中不应当确立举证责任倒置规则。针对贪污罪、受贿罪,立法有必要确立没收犯罪所得的举证责任倒置规则,这并不违反无罪推定原则,而是基于公平性和公共政策、举证便利性因素的合理选择。
|
| 关 键 词： | 没收 举证责任倒置 无罪推定 |
On Rebuttal Burden of Proof in Criminal Confiscation |
| |
| GAO Chang-jian. On Rebuttal Burden of Proof in Criminal Confiscation[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2012, 0(5): 100-103 |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Chang-jian |
| |
| Affiliation: | GAO Chang-jian |
| |
| Abstract: | In the procedure of confiscating gains from corruption crimes,article 31 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption provides shifting of burden of proof.The article 280 of the new CPL shouldn’t stipulate the rule of shifting of burden of proof,but it should be established in the case of embezzlement and bribery crimes.The shifting of burden of proof in corruption crimes cases doesn’t violate the principle of presumption of innocence,but the reasonable requirement of fairness and public policy. |
| |
| Keywords: | confiscation burden of proof in reverse the principle of presumption of innocence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
