首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

采矿权应归属自物权而不属准物权 --与《准物权研究》的作者商榷
引用本文:康继田. 采矿权应归属自物权而不属准物权 --与《准物权研究》的作者商榷[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2005, 17(6): 50-52
作者姓名:康继田
作者单位:娄底市委党校,湖南,娄底,417000
摘    要:采矿权属准物权,从理论上使国家矿产所有权失踪了,实践中是国有资产流失的暗道.采矿权归属准物权的根本原因是客体的模糊性其客体被矿业权淹灭了、被抽象的矿产资源虚化了、被特许的公权力压迫着.<准物权研究>在这一方面出现了认识上的障碍.实质上采矿权的客体是从地壳中分离前的矿产,清晰地裸露着,因此,应当大胆承认采矿权是自物权.

关 键 词:采矿权  采矿权客体  矿产资源资产化
文章编号:1671-5195(2005)06-0050-03
修稿时间:2005-07-04

Mining Right is Autonomous Article Right not Near Article Right --To Discuss with the Author of "A Research on Near Article Right"
KANG Ji-tian. Mining Right is Autonomous Article Right not Near Article Right --To Discuss with the Author of "A Research on Near Article Right"[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2005, 17(6): 50-52
Authors:KANG Ji-tian
Abstract:Mining right is a near article right.In theory it makes the state possessory title to mineral disappear while in practice it is a dark way to lose the state capital.The reason of being near article right is the unclear object.The object of mining right is covered by the title to mineral,abstract mineral and special public right.In fact the object is mineral separated from the earth.Therefore,it should be an autonomous article right.
Keywords:mining right  the object of mining right  make mineral resource property
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号