State Crimes of Previous Regimes: Knowledge, Accountability, and the Policing of the Past |
| |
| Authors: | Stanley Cohen |
| |
| Affiliation: | Professor of criminology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. He is grateful to John Braithwaite, Peter Siegelman, and the journal's anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. |
| |
| Abstract: | The policy of lustration is set in the context of responses to abuses of power by previous regimes. Using examples from three recent forms of social reconstruction (in Latin America, the former communist states, and South Africa), the author reviews the “justice in transition” debate. How do societies going through democratization confront the human rights violations committed by the previous regime? Five aspects of this debate are reviewed: (1) truth: establishing and confronting the knowledge of what happened in the past; (2) justice: making offenders accountable for their past violations through three possible methods: punishment through the criminal law, compensation and restitution, and mass disqualification such as lustration; (3) impunity: giving amnesty to previous offenders; (4) expiation; and (5) reconciliation and reconstruction. A concluding discussion raises the implications of the subject for the study of time and social control. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
