首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Do all bridges collapse? Possibilities for democracy in the European Union
Authors:Pepper D Culpepper  Archon Fung
Institution:(1) John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 John F. Kennedy St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;(2) John F. Kennedy School of Government, Room Taubman 356, 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Abstract:It is tempting, but wrong, to infer from the failures of the EU draft constitution that all reforms based on increasing citizen participation in the European Union are doomed to fail. Andrew Moravcsik’s trenchant dismissal of the constitutional project commits this error. Moravcsik’s sweeping claims, based on what he calls empirical social science, speak well beyond the evidence on democratic institutional innovations. Participatory measures such as consultative Citizens’ Assemblies may articulate a citizens’ perspective that can help to anchor the democratic legitimacy of the EU. We do not know if such innovations can resolve the problems of the democratic deficit, but we do know that empirical social science has not spoken decisively on the issue. It is worth examining their democratic potential rather than dismissing them outright. This article develops and draws on ideas we first expressed in an online symposium with Andrew Moravcsik and others, hosted by Notre Europe (Culpepper/Fung 2006b).
Keywords:Constitutional Treaty  European Union  Democraic Deficit  Deliberation  Participation
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号