首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

盗窃罪与职务侵占罪研判
引用本文:俞敏. 盗窃罪与职务侵占罪研判[J]. 山西警官高等专科学校学报, 2013, 21(2): 54-56
作者姓名:俞敏
作者单位:杭州市富阳市人民检察院,浙江杭州,311400
摘    要:盗窃罪与职务侵占罪的辨析一直是办案实务中的争议难点。文章对盗窃罪及职务侵占罪进行细化分析并就如何准确定性进行了研判,提出四大定性法则:即工作之便抑或职务之便定性法则,是否具有合法权限持有、管理单位财物定性法则,法益定性法则,被侵犯财物的状况定性法则。

关 键 词:盗窃罪  职务侵占罪  辨析  定性

Study and Judgment on Larceny and Crime of Duty Occupation
YU Min. Study and Judgment on Larceny and Crime of Duty Occupation[J]. Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy, 2013, 21(2): 54-56
Authors:YU Min
Affiliation:YU Min ( Hangzhou Fuyang People' s Procuratorate, Hangzhou 311400, China)
Abstract:Discrimination between larceny and crime of duty occupation is always a controversial problem in the practice. The paper analyzed larceny and crime of duty occupation in details and made a study on the accurate qualitative judgment. What' s more, it put forward four qualitative rules that whether it is "work convenience" or "duty convenience", whether it is "managing unit property with lawful authority" ,it is judged by legal interest and it is judged by the state of vitiated property.
Keywords:larceny  crime of duty occupation  discrimination  qualitative
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号