当引渡“遭遇”死刑

二战后,由于国际人权保护观念的高涨,“死刑不引渡”原则作为死刑废止论的一个表征和限制引渡的“安全阀”之一,而引人注目.当引渡“遭遇”死刑,当死刑关涉人权,当三者聚合在国际刑事司法合作中时,在保留死刑和废除死刑的国家间,造成了一些互不谅解的情况.其实,就目前世界发展状况而言,生存权仍是一种相对权,保留死刑和保障人权并不矛盾,各国应抱着求同存异的态度,协商解决矛盾,实现生存权和公共秩序保护之间的均衡.

When Extradition Encounters Death Penalty

After World War II,due to the upsurge in the protection of human rights,the principle of non-extradition of death penalty,as a characterization of the abolishment of death penalty and one of the "safety valves" to limit the extradition,is highly notable.When extradition encounters death penalty,when death penalty is involved with human rights,when the three get together in international criminal justice cooperation,conflicts arises between the countries which retain death penalty and the countries which do not.In fact,judging from the trend of the world’s development,living right is still a relative right.Retaining the death penalty and the protection of human rights are not contradictory.Countries should hold an attitude of seeking common ground while reserving differences.The conflicts should be solved through negotiation,so as to realize the balance between the living right and the protection of public order.