Cassirer in Davos. An Intermezzo on Magic Mountain (1929) |
| |
Authors: | Deniz Coskun |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Faculty of Law, Radboud University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | The Davos-debate between Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger at Davos in 1929 has proved a landmark in the history of twentieth century philosophy. The debate not only marked the end of the heyday of continental Neo-Kantian philosophy, but influenced, although in implicit ways, legal and political theory as well. At various levels of discourse, philosophical, moral philosophical, and that of legal and political philosophy, in the first half of the twentieth century Cassirer acted as the advocate of what remained of the old European humanist tradition. Heidegger, on the contrary, acted as the exponent of the emerging existentialist, anti-humanist movement that would soon supplant the old tradition in significance and force. This is an account of an imaginary encounter between two traditions, so that the clash of their opposing forces may shed sparks on a (still) dark era in Western philosophical history. The conclusion sums up the lessons or wisdom to be learned for political and legal theory. |
| |
Keywords: | Cassirer Davos Heidegger law as symbolic form Neo-Kantianism |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|