首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

药物麻醉分析中的法律问题
引用本文:曾建林. 药物麻醉分析中的法律问题[J]. 法律与医学杂志, 2004, 11(2): 144-146
作者姓名:曾建林
作者单位:北京大学法学院 100871
摘    要:司法精神病鉴定中被鉴定人也享有沉默权。因为享有沉默权的主体包括所有公民 ,使用的时机是任何有可能导致被追究刑事责任的时候 ,沉默权的效果之一是禁止使用麻醉分析方法收集证据。因此所有在麻醉分析过程中获得的材料都不得被作为证据采纳。但是鉴定结论可以作为专家证据由法庭决定是否采纳。

关 键 词:麻醉分析  沉默权  证据可采性  鉴定结论
文章编号:1007-9297(2004)02-0144-03
修稿时间:2003-10-23

Legal problems on anaesthetization analysis
ZENG Jian-lin. Law School of Peking University,.. Legal problems on anaesthetization analysis[J]. The Journal of Law & Medicine, 2004, 11(2): 144-146
Authors:ZENG Jian-lin. Law School of Peking University  .
Affiliation:ZENG Jian-lin. Law School of Peking University,100871.
Abstract:The appraised individual have the right to keep silence during the period of judicial appraisal of psychosis. All citizen have the right to keep silence when he/she is under the danger of being pursued to bear criminal responsibility. Prohibiting evidences collected under the condition of anaesthetization is one of the effect of the right to keep silence, so the materials obtained under the condition of anaesthetization was unaccepted as a evidence. However, whether acceptance the expertise conclusion, as a kind of expert evidence, is decided by the court.
Keywords:Right to keep silence  Anaesthetization analysis  Evidence admissible  Expertise Conclusion
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号