| 刑事立案程序有关问题及其制度完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 韩德明. 刑事立案程序有关问题及其制度完善[J]. 山东警察学院学报, 2005, 17(3): 64-69 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 韩德明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏警官学院侦查系,江苏,南京,210012 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省哲学社会科学研究"十五"规划基金重点项目"司法改革与司法现代化研究"阶段性成果之一,项目批准号:04FXA001。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国刑事诉讼法规定了立案程序,由此而引发了立案前能否采取侦查措施以及立案前措施到底属于何种法律程序性质的争论。本文批判了这类争论的建构主义唯理论理路,引入实践理性理论范式,经分析认为立案程序本身即为一道多余的法定程序,立案前措施的法律程序性质的名分并不重要,关键要看该类措施的采取是否为发现犯罪事实真相之所需。侦查措施的采取一旦要涉及他人人身、财产权利的时候,是由侦查机关自主决定还是要得到批准,受到法官的审查和监督,这才是刑事程序启动环节中的关键问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事立案程序 实践理性 侦查措施 治安行政程序措施 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-1565(2005)03-0064-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-12-27 |
Some Problems in the Initiative Procedure of Criminal Justice and the Means of Improvement |
| |
| HAN De-ming. Some Problems in the Initiative Procedure of Criminal Justice and the Means of Improvement[J]. Journal of Shandong Police College, 2005, 17(3): 64-69 |
| |
| Authors: | HAN De-ming |
| |
| Abstract: | The initiative procedure of criminal justice set in China's Criminal Procedure Law brings out a disputation: whether pre-arrest investigations belong to the criminal investigation procedure or to the administrative procedure. Based on the theory of practical reason, this article concludes that the procedure of pre-arrest investigations is an unnecessary one. How to carry out investigations to put a case on trial is the practical reason process. |
| |
| Keywords: | initiative procedure of criminal justice practical reason criminal investigation measure public security administrative measure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
