首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


American evangelicals and domestic versus international climate policy
Authors:Stephen Chaudoin  David Thomas Smith  Johannes Urpelainen
Affiliation:1. Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh, 4612 Welsey W. Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
2. Department of Government and International Affairs, University of Sydney, H03-Institute Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
3. Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, 712 IAB., New York, NY, 10027, USA
Abstract:Because a significant portion of the American electorate identify themselves as evangelical Christians, the evangelical position on climate policy is important to determining the role the United States could play in global climate cooperation. Do evangelicals oppose all climate policies, or are they particularly opposed to certain types of policies? We argue that American evangelicals oppose climate policy due to their distrust of international cooperation and institutions, which has been a prominent feature of evangelical politics since the beginning of the Cold War. Using data from the 2011 Faith and Global Policy Challenges survey and the 2010 Chicago Council Global View survey, we find support for the theory. Evangelicals are equally likely to support domestic climate policy as other Americans, but they are significantly less likely to support international treaties on climate cooperation. The findings suggest that proponents of climate policy could win more evangelicals to their side by focusing on domestic action, instead of multilateral negotiations or international institutions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号