简论《侵权责任法》第五十八条的逻辑困境

《侵权责任法》的规定存在巨大的逻辑困境，其第（一）项规定与第（二）项和第（三）项规定是不相容的，导致法条在表述时无法选取合适的词语来对该三项规定进行统辖。该条在“有下列情形”和“因下列情形”、“推定”和“认定”的使用上未加区别，也体现出对相关理论问题研究的欠缺。因此，应当将它们分开规定，以避免在法律适用上和认识上的混乱。

On Article 58 of Tort Liability Law

There are huge logic dilemmas in Article 58 of Tort Liability Law,item (a) is incompatible with item (b) and item (c),these logic dilemmas lead to the provision unable to select appropriate words to the cover the three items.This article makes no distinction between the use of in and because of the following circumstances,presumpt and identify,this also reflects the lack of researching on the theoretical issues.Therefore,we should separate these items in order to avoid the chaos in application and understan...