首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

公诉审查:比较、反思与完善
引用本文:吴光升. 公诉审查:比较、反思与完善[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2007, 19(3): 69-73
作者姓名:吴光升
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京,100088
摘    要:公诉审查对防止不必要的审判、保护被告人的合法权益、节省司法资源具有重要意义,大多数国家的刑事诉讼中都设有公诉审查制度。公诉审查分为程序性审查和实体性审查。我国的公诉审查是一种程序性审查,这种审查具有诸多缺陷,应从审查范围、审查主体、审查标准等方面对其进行改革与完善。

关 键 词:公诉审查  实体审查  程序审查
文章编号:1671-5195(2007)03-0069-05
修稿时间:2007-03-01

The Examination to Public Prosecution:Comparison, Rethinking and Perfecting
WU Guang-sheng. The Examination to Public Prosecution:Comparison, Rethinking and Perfecting[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2007, 19(3): 69-73
Authors:WU Guang-sheng
Affiliation:WU Guang-sheng(The China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
Abstract:Because the examination to public prosecution is important to avoid unnecessary trial,protect the legal rights and interests of the accused and save the justice resources,most countries establish the examination systems of public prosecution in their criminal procedures,which include substantial examination and procedural examination.The examination system of public prosecution of China is a kind of procedural examinations which has a lot of defects,so we should reform or perfect its scope,checker,standard and so on.
Keywords:public prosecution  procedural examination  substantial examination
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号