Copiepresse SCRL & alii v. Google Inc. – In its decision of 5 May 2011, the Brussels Court of Appeal confirms the prohibitory injunction order banning Google News and Google’s “in cache” function |
| |
Authors: | Philippe Laurent |
| |
Affiliation: | CRIDS (Research Centre in Information, Law & Society) – FUNDP (University of Namur, Belgium) & Lawyer at the Brussels Bar, Marx Van Ranst Vermeersch & Partners, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | In 2003, Google made available in Belgium its online free service “Google News”, which consisted in offering Internet users a computer-generated press review. In his orders of 5 September 2006 (previously commented in [2007] 23 CLSR 82–85) and of 13 February 2007 (previously commented in [2007] 23 CLSR 290–293) the President of the High Court of Brussels found that, by offering this service, Google infringed the copyrights of Belgian press editors and authors. On 5 May 2011, the Brussels Court of Appeal upheld to a very large extent the first instance decision. The Court confirmed that Google’s “cache” function and its “Google News” service were infringing the claimants’ copyrights and that Google could not rely on any copyright limitation (such as the exceptions for quotation or for report on news events), legislation or fundamental right. |
| |
Keywords: | Copiepresse v. Google Google News Cache function E-Commerce directive |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|