首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刑法中的类型思维之提倡
引用本文:齐文远,苏彩霞. 刑法中的类型思维之提倡[J]. 法律科学, 2010, 28(1): 69-81
作者姓名:齐文远  苏彩霞
作者单位:北京大学法学院,北京,100871 
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究项目 
摘    要:类型思维是概念思维呈现没落态势时的基本法学思维方式,具有价值导向性、介于抽象与具体之间的中间性、使法规范与生活现实相互调适的开放性等特点。在刑法立法上,类型化应是我国将来的刑事立法发展方向;在刑法适用中,合理解释犯罪构成要件、准确形成案件事实都离不开类型思维。类型思维引入刑法领域,标志着刑法学摒弃主客体分离而采用主客体并存的认识模式,意味着刑法解释立场由形式解释论、主观解释论向实质解释论、客观解释论的革新,并带来了对禁止类推解释原则的深思。

关 键 词:概念思维  类型思维  构成要件解释  案件事实认定

Criminal Law Research:Resuscitation at the Eve of Dying
QI Wen yuan,SU Cai xia. Criminal Law Research:Resuscitation at the Eve of Dying[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2010, 28(1): 69-81
Authors:QI Wen yuan  SU Cai xia
Abstract:Typological thinking is a basic legal thinking pattern while the conceptual thinking declines, which boasts of the nature of value orientation, staying in the middle of the abstract and concrete, the openness mutually adjusted by legal norms and the realities,and etc. In criminal legislation, typification should be the direction of crim- inal legislation development in the future. In the application of criminal law, the reasonable explanation of criminal constitutive requirements and the determination of the case facts all need typological thinking. The introduce of ty pological thinking in criminal law marks the criminal law's abandonment of the separation of the subject with the object and its acceptance of the cognition mode of the coexistence of the subject and the object, which means the innovation from formal interpretation and the subjective interpretation theories to substantive interpretation and objective interpretation theories, and also invokes further consideration of the principle of banning typological interpretation.
Keywords:conceptual thinking  typological thinking  interpretation of constitutive requirements  affirmation of case facts
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号