司法的真相——在法律解释的合法性与妥当性之间

对规范和事实的不同安置,以及由此折射出的对合法性与正义性的不同态度,构成了西方法学史的全部。但至少到目前为止,纠缠于规范与事实、合法与正义之间的争论似乎并未取得令人满意的成果。而从现代西方哲学的商谈理论中我们发现,只有放弃学术立场上的任何一种“独断”,实现规范与事实、法律共同体与相应“听众”之间的合意,并对合法性与正义性进行适合法学语境的重新解读,才能最终缓解甚至消除合法性与正义性(妥当性)之间的冲突。

The Truth of Adjudication:Between Legitimacy and Appropriateness of Legal Interpretation

The history of western legal science is a history that how to assort with the conflict between legal norm and fact,which reflect the distinct attitude. Up to now,at least, the disputes about legal norm and fact, legitimacy and fairness,have not received a satisfactory conclusion. From the argument theory of western philosophy, we find that achieving consensus between legal norm and fact, and among the law community and all the 'audience', by means of rereading the means of legitimacy and fairness under the context of law science, is the only effective way to ease the conflict between legitimacy and fairness.