首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


What consideration sets can teach us about electoral competition: A two-hurdle model
Affiliation:1. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico;2. Washington University in St. Louis, United States;1. Harvard University, Department of Government, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States;2. Yale University, Institution for Social and Policy Studies and the Center for the Study of American Politics, ISPS C226, 77 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States
Abstract:Consideration set models (CSMs) offer a novel way to study electoral behavior. Until now, they have been mostly studied at the micro-level of the voter's decision process. By contrast, we focus on the implications of CSMs for understanding the phenomenon of party competition. We propose a two hurdle model whereby parties compete for both consideration and selection, pursuant the consideration and choice stages of the CSM. We operationalize these hurdles in terms of a party's inclusivity—is it being considered?—and exclusivity—is it considered on its own?—and formally derive lower- and upper-bounds for the electoral fortunes of the party. We also show how consideration set data can be used to sketch the competition landscape in an election and to characterize the system-wide competitiveness of a political system. We illustrate our concepts and ideas using data from the 2010 Dutch and 2014 Swedish parliamentary elections.
Keywords:Consideration set models  Party competition  Political parties  Social networks
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号