宪法诉讼中的审查基准

宪法诉讼中的审查基准,是指违宪审查机构在对相关法律进行审查、判定的时候,所秉持的价值评判准则.自1938年美国的"凯罗琳产品案"以来,"二元基准"逐渐被确立,并在建立宪法诉讼制度的国家产生了深远的影响."二元基准"确立的原因主要包括三个方面:首先,社会情势的发展变化内在地要求放宽对关涉经济之立法的审查;其次,基本权利的不同秉性内在地要求对不同性质的基本权利施加不同的审查;其三,维系代议民主政治和宪法裁判机构之正当性内在地要求对关涉精神自由和经济自由的立法施加不同的审查.

The Censoring Benchmark in the Constitutional Litigation

The censoring benchmark in the constitutional litigation is the benchmark that the censorship holds to censor the correlative law. After the case of the United States v. Carolene Products Company, the "duality benchmark" was established gradually and brought far-reaching influence in the countries in which the constitutional litigation is established. There are three causes in establishing the "duality benchmark" :Firstly, the development of the state of affairs requests internally to broaden the checkup on the economical law; Secondly,the different attribute of the constitutional rights requests internally to censor the constitutional rights in different ways;Thirdly,in order to hold together the democracy and the justice of the censorship, it requests internally to censor the kw in different ways according to its character, namely, whether it is the law on the spirit freedom or the law on the economical freedom.