| 论相对独立的量刑程序 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李玉萍.论相对独立的量刑程序[J].政法论丛,2009(6):62-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李玉萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所,北京,100006 |
| |
| 基金项目： | USAID资助的中国人民大学与美国律协合作项目《量刑程序改革》的阶段性研究成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 量刑程序的正当性与量刑程序与定罪程序分离的可行性属于两个不同层面的问题。现阶段我国尚不具备将定罪与量刑程序完全分离的制度条件，而只能构建相对独立的量刑程序，即在法庭审理的主要环节，将定罪与量刑活动相对分离。在将量刑活动纳入法庭审理程序时，应当注意处理好量刑建议与量刑裁量权之间的关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 量刑程序 定罪程序 “二分”模式 相对独立 量刑建议 |
On the Sentencing Procedure of the Relative Independence |
| |
| Li Yu-ping.On the Sentencing Procedure of the Relative Independence[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2009(6):62-66. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Yu-ping |
| |
| Institution: | Li Yu-ping ( China Institute of Applied Jurisprudence of the Supreme People＇ s Court, Beijing 100006) |
| |
| Abstract: | The rationalityof sentencing procedure and the possibility of separatingthe sentencing procedure from the conviction procedure are two different issues. The situation of our country determines that we can not adopt the ＂separating mode＂ but the ＂relative independent mode ＂ ,which means that in each substantial procedure in the court, sentencing issues should be paid attention. The relationship between the sentencing suggestion and the sentencing consideration is another issue that should be dealedwithseriously. |
| |
| Keywords: | sentencing procedure conviction procedure bifurcated trial relative separation sentencing suggestion |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
