首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中日侦查阶段律师辩护制度比较研究
引用本文:王冠军,张伟. 中日侦查阶段律师辩护制度比较研究[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2005, 20(4): 104-108
作者姓名:王冠军  张伟
作者单位:安徽大学法学院,安徽,合肥,230039
摘    要:侦查程序作为刑事诉讼的重要组成部分,应具有侦查机关与犯罪嫌疑人之间平等对抗的“诉讼”特性。在犯罪嫌疑人受各种条件的限制不可能实现其自行辩护权利的情况下,犯罪嫌疑人辩护律师辩护职能的充分发挥无疑对达到这种“平等对抗”具有至关重要的作用。反观我国的现行立法,由于受各种因素的影响,律师在侦查阶段辩护职能发挥得并不理想。基于此,本文针对这一问题,通过与正在进行改革并已取得巨大成功的日本相关制度进行比较分析,以期从中获得有益提示。

关 键 词:侦查  律师  辩护  比较
文章编号:1008-8628(2005)04-0104-05
修稿时间:2005-04-12

A Comparison of the Institution of the Defendant Lawyer in Japan and China in the Process of Investigation
WANG Guan-jun,ZHANG-Wei. A Comparison of the Institution of the Defendant Lawyer in Japan and China in the Process of Investigation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2005, 20(4): 104-108
Authors:WANG Guan-jun  ZHANG-Wei
Abstract:As important part of criminal procedure, the process of investigation should has "litigation" character which will produce equal fight between investigator and criminal. Under the circumstance which has kinds of limited conditions for the defendant, so he couldn't fulfill his self-defense right .The role of defendant lawyers are vital to this kind of equal fight. Viewing our present law the role of defendant lawyers in the process of investigation didn't fulfill very well. Based on this issue ,by comparison with the related Japanese institution ,which are improving and gain great success .Expecting to draw some prompting from it.
Keywords:investigate  lawyer  defend  comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号