| 中日“冲之鸟”争端的国际法分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴卡. 中日“冲之鸟”争端的国际法分析[J]. 云南大学学报(法学版), 2006, 19(2): 111-114 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴卡 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学法政学院 浙江金华321004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “冲之鸟”岛礁之争是中日海洋权益争端的具体表现。“冲之鸟”不具备1982年《联合国海洋法公约》中规定的岛屿的构成要件,因而不是岛屿。相反,“冲之鸟”符合岩礁的条件,因此显而易见它是岩礁。日本主张“冲之鸟”是岛屿,可以拥有200海里的专属经济区是没有国际法根据的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 冲之鸟 岛屿 岩礁 国际法 |
| 文章编号： | CN53-1143/D(2006)02-0111-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-12-15 |
An International Law Analysis of the Dispute over Okinotorishima between China and Japan |
| |
| Wu Ka. An International Law Analysis of the Dispute over Okinotorishima between China and Japan[J]. Journal of Yunnan University(Law Edition), 2006, 19(2): 111-114 |
| |
| Authors: | Wu Ka |
| |
| Abstract: | The dispute over Okinotorishima whether it is an island or a rock is a concrete manifestation of maritime power dispute between China and Japan. Okinotorishima doesn't satisfy the conditions of island, while conforming to the demands of rock listed in the 1982 UNCLOS, so far from being an island, it is obvious a rock. Japan's assertion that Okinotorishima is an island and can own 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone is groundless in international law. |
| |
| Keywords: | Okinotorishima Island Rock International law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
