首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论一事不再理原则与我国死刑案件的再审
引用本文:黄京平,彭辅顺. 论一事不再理原则与我国死刑案件的再审[J]. 现代法学, 2004, 26(4): 69-74
作者姓名:黄京平  彭辅顺
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院,北京,100872
摘    要:再审制度是作为一事不再理原则的例外出现的。一事不再理原则及其例外的基本价值取向在于保障人权。若从再审以人权保障为主旨角度审视,我国以刑事审判监督程序为主要依据的死刑案件再审,在死刑犯提起再审的时间保证、启动再审的主体以及再审的审判管辖等方面还存在着种种制度缺陷,需要进行改造。改造的主要思路是建立有利于被告人人权保障的死刑案件再审制度。

关 键 词:一事不再理原则  人权保障  再审制度  死刑案件再审
文章编号:1001-2397(2004)04-0069-06
修稿时间:2004-06-28

On Non Bis in Idem and the Retrial of China''''s Death Penalty Case
HUANG Jing-ping ,PENG Fu-shun. On Non Bis in Idem and the Retrial of China''''s Death Penalty Case[J]. Modern Law Science, 2004, 26(4): 69-74
Authors:HUANG Jing-ping   PENG Fu-shun
Affiliation:HUANG Jing-ping 1,PENG Fu-shun 2
Abstract:The retrial system is brought forth as an exception of the non bis in idem,whose basic value orientation lies in protecting the human rights. If scanned closely from angle of human rights protecting of the retrial, the retrial of China's death penalty cases taking criminal procedure for supervision upon adjudication as its main basis, has some defects in its system, such as the time guarantee of death penalty malefactors bringing forward retrial, the main body of the starting retrial, and the judgment domination of the retrial.Therefore, the retrial system needs to be reformed.
Keywords:non bis in idem principle  human rights protecting  retrial system  retrial of death penalty case
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号