| 量刑程序中的证据问题探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许瑶.量刑程序中的证据问题探析[J].辽宁警专学报,2014(2):13-17. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许瑶 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学 法学院,重庆401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“量刑程序中的证据与证明问题研究”（11YJA820108）的阶段性成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国在量刑规范化的改革中确立了相对独立的量刑程序,改变了过去量刑程序与定罪程序合一的状态,使量刑程序与定罪程序出现了相对分离,同时,由于量刑程序与定罪程序相比又有自己的特点,适用于定罪程序的证据规则不一定适用量刑程序。因此,为了准确地进行量刑,就有必要对量刑程序中的证据问题进行研究,构建出量刑程序中的证据适用规则。
|
| 关 键 词： | 量刑程序 证据能力 证据收集 证明标准 |
A Tentative Study on the Issue of Evidence in Sentencing Procedure |
| |
| XU Yao.A Tentative Study on the Issue of Evidence in Sentencing Procedure[J].Journal of Liaoning Police Academy,2014(2):13-17. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Yao |
| |
| Institution: | XU Yao (School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The relatively independent sentencing procedure has been established in the reform of sentencing standardization in China, which has changed the blending state of the sentencing procedure and the conviction procedure in the past and has separated the two procedures instead. Meanwhile, since the sentencing procedure has its unique characteristics, the rules of evidence applicable to the conviction procedure are not necessarily applicable to the sentencing procedure. Therefore, in order to have an accurate measurement of penalty, it is necessary to study the issue of evidences in sentencing procedure and to construct its own applicable rules of evidence. |
| |
| Keywords: | sentencing procedure evidence capacity collection of evidence standard of proof |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
