The internet and the state: Instrument of social control or subversive tecnology? |
| |
Authors: | Chris Atchison Jim Thomas |
| |
Institution: | (1) University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;(2) Northern Illinois University, Illinois, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Conclusion Technological progress always contains within it the ironic dialectic of liberation and domination. The computer-based information
highway is no exception. As a consequence, our own view is that the computer revolution contains the potential for both over-control
and subversion of control. Science and technology are not neutral. They are social constructs that exist only within a context
of choices of development and application. Therefore, it is not the technology that constrains, or oppresses, or liberates.
Rather, the emancipatory potential of this new technology lies in the degree to which those who use it can disseminate it
and maintain it as a relatively low-cost communication tool. To date, many of those involved in expanding the Internet frontier
have generally been suspicious of and resistant to government intrusion into the Net. While it is often easier to simply dismiss
such suspicion as the ranting of conspiracy theorists, history has taught us that such a na?ve faith in the benevolence of
the government is unwise. Our intention here has not been to provide a definitive conclusion about the past, present, or future
state of technological progress; instead we hope that our discussion will spark further critical analysis of technology and
related topics. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|