| 理性的困惑:请求权竞合理论解构——兼评我国《合同法》第122条 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周清林. 理性的困惑:请求权竞合理论解构——兼评我国《合同法》第122条[J]. 现代法学, 2003, 25(1): 40-47 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周清林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,重庆,400031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 请求权竞合是什么?真的有请求权竞合存在吗?本文从法典编纂中人类理性的狂妄和理性本身的局限性出发,在评价各家理论的基础上认为,请求权竞合仅为现象,实质上并不存在请求权竞合。在真正意义上,请求权竞合只反映一类法律关系,只是囿于类型的局限,请求权竞合呈现在两类法律关系中。援用对话哲学的方式,通过两类法律关系之间的对话,本文力图使之趋于真实。
|
| 关 键 词： | 请求权竞合 请求权规范竞合 理性 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2397(2003)01-0040-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-07-08 |
The Perplexity of Rationality: the Deconstruction of "Theorie der Ansprnchskonknrren"--And Appraising Article 122 of the Contract Law |
| |
| ZHOU Qing - lin. The Perplexity of Rationality: the Deconstruction of "Theorie der Ansprnchskonknrren"--And Appraising Article 122 of the Contract Law[J]. Modern Law Science, 2003, 25(1): 40-47 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Qing - lin |
| |
| Abstract: | What is the Ansprnchskonknrren? Where is the Ansprnchskonknrren? From the point of wildly arrogant rational of human and the limitation of the rational, based on appraising the theories, this article argues that the Ansprnchskonknrren is only an appearance, and as a matter of fact, there is not the Ansprnchskonknrren. In fact, Ansprnchkonknrren only reflects one type of law relation. The Ansprnchskonknrren appears in two categories of law relation , because of the limitation of type. By one type of law speaking to the other, this article tries to unify these two types of law. |
| |
| Keywords: | ansprnchskonknrren anspruchsnomienkonkurrenz rationality non - rationality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
