| 论"质、剂、契、券"不等于法律行为--对民事法律行为本质合法说质疑之四 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高在敏,陈涛. 论"质、剂、契、券"不等于法律行为--对民事法律行为本质合法说质疑之四[J]. 法律科学, 2002, 0(6): 67-82 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高在敏 陈涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 高在敏（西北政法学院,陕西,西安,710063）;陈涛（西北政法学院,陕西,西安,710063） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 将中国古代的"质、剂、契、券"直接说成法律行为,意在为法律行为本质合法说张目,但通过对两者演进历史、概念对象以及各自功能的剖析,即知法律行为以公、私法划分为发生前提,以弘扬个人自由主义为文化底蕴和根本目的.而"质、剂、契、券",既有染于中国国家形成的"酋邦模式",又一直系军事、政治、礼制、律例的共有性术语,既曾指以"合券为证"为特征的官方具造文牒,又承担着敛财与推行严密监控的专政功能,表明两者始终都是一种绝对对立的关系.
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律行为 质、剂、契、券 个人自由主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-6914(2002)06-0067-(16) |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-07-15 |
Inquiry to Nature of Civil Legal Act (4) |
| |
| GAO Zai-ming,CHEN Tao. Inquiry to Nature of Civil Legal Act (4)[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2002, 0(6): 67-82 |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Zai-ming CHEN Tao |
| |
| Abstract: | With the division of public law and private law as the prerequisite, the fundamental goal of legal act is to advocate the personal liberalism. After analysis of the history, concepts and functions, it can be seen that there exists no real civil legal act in ancient China. Compared with the western countries, the civil legal act in ancient China, as it is much connected with the military, political, courtesy, and law, differentiates quietly with the civil legal act of the western countries in nature. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal behavior personal liberalism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
