法官阐明权范围新探

在民事诉讼中,法官的阐明制度不仅能修正辩论主义所带来的弊端,也有助于防止突袭裁判,探寻事实真相,追求双方当事人的实质平等。在社会诉讼观的倡导下,法官的阐明制度成为法官与当事人对话的一种纽带。法官阐明权范围的扩大成为当今民事诉讼发展的普遍趋势。借鉴德国、日本和我国的台湾地区关于法官阐明权范围的规定,我国可以效仿德国的法官实质指挥诉讼义务体系,从两个方面来界定阐明权的范围：一是建立阐明权范围的一般标准;二是明确阐明权的具体范围。

New Exploration The Scope Of Judge's Clarification Power

In civil litigation,the judge＇s clarification system not only amends the malpractice caused by the adversary doctrine,but also helps to prevent raids judgment,explore the truth,the pursuit of substantive equality of both parties.Advocated by the Social Litigation Conception,the judge＇s clarification system becomes a link in a dialogue between the judge and the parties.Expanding the scope of the judge＇s clarification power becomes a common trend in the development of civil litigation today.About the judge＇s clarification power scope provision in Germany,Japan and China＇s Taiwan region for reference,we can follow the example of the judge in Germany substantially control litigation obligation system,defining the scope of the judge＇s clarification power from two aspects：first setting up the general standard of it;second,clearing the specific scope of it.