财产权的入宪路径与民主检验

财产权入宪有近代与现代两条路径,它们在理论基础、适用原则、补偿基准等方面存在较大的差异。近代路径采取绝对保障模式,虽然在一定的历史阶段繁荣了经济、促进了自由,但在现代背景下其越发凸显出反民主多数的原罪难题。现代路径对近代路径进行了民主检验,采取相对保障模式。为实现财产权与民主多数的和谐,现代路径重构了财产权制度之目的、扩展了警察权力的范围、创立了宽松的司法审查基准。中国现处于社会主义初级阶段,近代课题与现代课题相互交融,在财产权入宪问题上,宜采取具有中国特色的混合路径。

Constitution Route of Property Right and Its Democracy Examination

The proprietary of entering the constitution has modern and modern routes;it has a greater difference in such aspects as theoretical foundation,applicable principle and compensating basis.Adopted absolute protective mode in the modern route,though it brought about a prosperous economy,promoted freedom in certain historical stage,but producing original sin difficult problems of democracy under modern background.After democracy examination to the modern route,the prensent routine adopting the relative protective mode.In order to realize most harmony between proprietary and democracy,prensent route reconstruct proprietary purpose,expanse range of police power,establish loose judicial review standard.at socialism initial stage now,facing modern subject and prensent subject,China should adopt the mixing route with charabstrabstracteristic of Chinese in the entering constitution in proprietary domain.