对秘密窃取封缄委托物内物品行为性质的认定

受托人秘密窃取封缄委托物内物品的行为究竟应认定为侵占罪还是盗窃罪？目前,学术界在这一问题上有区别说、修正区别说和非区别说等。从法理上讲,对某一行为性质的认定,应当结合行为人在行为时的主观心理状态,以及行为的手段、行为对象的特殊性等主客观因素进行全面考查,而不能局限于行为的表面现象或某一方面。从这个角度看,当行为人不法占有封缄物内物品时,应当认定为盗窃罪而不是侵占罪。

On Convicting the Act of Secretly Taking away the Property from a Sealed,Entrusted Thing

Should the entrustee’s behavior of stealing the sealed and entrusted thing be crime of embezzlement or theft？ At present, the academic circles has differentiating saying, amending differentiating saying, non-differentiating saying and so on. From the perspective of principle of law, to decide on one behavior＇s character ought to give it an all-round research including its subjective mental state, the behavior means, and particularity of behavior, and can not limit in one aspect or just surface. Regarding this, the entrustee＇s illegal possession behavior should be fixed as theft, not the crime of embezzlement.