首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刑法解释方法与人权保障的实现——从类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释谈起
引用本文:彭辅顺. 刑法解释方法与人权保障的实现——从类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释谈起[J]. 政法论丛, 2007, 0(1): 38-43
作者姓名:彭辅顺
作者单位:湖南大学法学院,湖南,长沙,410082
摘    要:无论是刑法类推解释、扩张解释还是限制解释,都不是在刑法规定的字面意义上所进行的解释,不能保障国民的预测可能性,因而均应当区分为有利于行为人的类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释和不利于行为人的类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释。前者有利于人权保障,应当允许;而后者不利于人权保障,应当禁止。

关 键 词:类推解释  扩张解释  限制解释  人权保障  实现
文章编号:1002-6274(2007)01-038-06

Explanation Method of Criminal Law and Realization of Safeguarding Human Rights
Peng Fu-shun. Explanation Method of Criminal Law and Realization of Safeguarding Human Rights[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2007, 0(1): 38-43
Authors:Peng Fu-shun
Abstract:Analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation of criminal law are not letter explanations of provisions of criminal law, which can not ensure forecast possibility of national people. Therefore, beneficial analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation to people and harmful analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation for people should be distinguished. The former ought to be allowed because it is beneficial to safeguarding human rights and the latter ought to be forbidden because it is harmful for safeguarding human rights.
Keywords:analogy explanation  dilative explanation  restrictive explanation  safeguarding human rights  realization
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号