| 论“集体研究”型渎职犯罪的责任认定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王旭.论“集体研究”型渎职犯罪的责任认定[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2014,26(4):113-116. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京市顺义区人民检察院,北京,101300 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "集体研究"本是民主决策的一种有效的方式,但是在实践中却逐渐异化为某些国家机关工作人员渎职犯罪的有效手段和逃避犯罪处罚的"挡箭牌"。本次两高出台了《关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(一)》,其中对"集体研究"型渎职犯罪的责任认定作了规定,这为有效打击这种类型的犯罪提供了依据和保障。
|
| 关 键 词： | “集体研究” 渎职犯罪 责任认定 |
Determination of Legal Responsibility in Crime of Malfeasance Committed through Collective Research |
| |
| WANG Xu.Determination of Legal Responsibility in Crime of Malfeasance Committed through Collective Research[J].Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,2014,26(4):113-116. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Xu |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Xu ( People＇ s Procuratorate of Shunyi District, Beijing 101300, China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | ＂Collective research＂ is an effective way of democratic decision-making, but in practice, it has gradually alienated to a useful tool of the malfeasant state organ personnel and a ＂shield＂ to escape criminal punishment. The ＂Interpretation of the Law Application Issues in Handling Criminal Cases of Malfeasance （one）＂enacted by the Supreme People＇s Procuratorate and the Supreme People＇s Court stipulates on legal responsibility in crime of malfeasance committed through collective research, becoming the basis and guarantee for effectively combating this type of crime. |
| |
| Keywords: | ＂collective research＂ crime of malfeasance determination of responsibility |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
