可辩驳思维与法治的可能性

法律中的可辩驳思维,是不同于演绎性思维、归纳性思维与类比性思维的新型思维方式,是具有规则性、主体间性的对话、交流、辩论与反驳的思维过程。可辩驳性是法律知识逻辑结构的本质属性,法律中的可辩驳思维在根本上是以法律的可辩驳性为基本前提的。可辩驳思维对"法治可能性"的证成,在微观、中观和宏观上均具有重要的理论意义和实践价值。法律中的可辩驳思维在本质上并不必然导致法治的不可能性,相反在合理把握的基础上,可辩驳思维一定程度上能提升法治的可能性。

Defeasible Thinking and the Possibility of Rule by Law

Different from deductive thinking, inductive thinking and analogical thinking, defeasible thinking is a new type of mode with regularity and the thinking process of inter-subjectivity dialogue, exchange, debate and rebuttal. Defeasibitity is an essential attribute of the logical structure of legal knowledge and defeasible thinking in law is fundamentally premised on the defeasibility of law. Applying defeasible thinking to justify the ＂possibility of rule by law＂ has theoretical significance and practical value at the micro, meso and macro levels. In essence, the defeasible legal thinking does not necessarily lead to the impossibility of rule by law. On the contrary, if it is reasonably applied, defeasible legal thinking will elevate the possibility of rule by law to some extent.