预决事实若干问题研究

现行司法解释对预决事实仅作了原则性的规定,然而,在司法实践中,这一规定的实施虽然有助于诉讼效率的提高,但在某些情况下,却违反了正当程序保障原则,造成了新的不公正。因此,预决事实在一定条件下才具有预决的效力,即参加诉讼的当事人相同;该事实须是人民法院判决的主要事实;对该事实的证明符合正当程序原则。符合条件,当事人无需举证,法院可以直接予以认证。基于此,具体分析了预决事实的具体适用情形。

On Some Problems of Fact Prejudged

Present judicial interpretation makes fundamental provisions about fact prejudged.Whose practice helps improve the litigation efficiency,though it goes against due Procedure Principal.It leads to another injustice.Nevertheless,it's recommended that fact prejudged should be endowed with force under certain condition.That is to say,the attending parties should be the same;the fact must be the essential fact of the judgment;the testimony of the fact should go with due Procedure Principal.With these conditions met,parties need not bear the burden of proof,which goes to the court.Based on the above mentioned,thesis embodies the idiographic application of fact prejudged.