首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对法定证据制度与自由心证制度内涵的探究
引用本文:曹凯. 对法定证据制度与自由心证制度内涵的探究[J]. 河南公安高等专科学校学报, 2007, 16(4): 66-68
作者姓名:曹凯
作者单位:湘潭大学,法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105
摘    要:法定证据与自由心证是两种重要的证据制度,但学界对二者内涵的认识却存在颇多分歧。从历史的角度入手,可以探究出这两种证据制度的真实内涵为“证明力的判断方法和证明标准的规定”。据此,我国的诉讼证明模式毫无疑问地应该采取让法官自己去评价证据和认定事实的自由心证模式。

关 键 词:法定证据  自由心证  证明模式

Research of the Conception of Legal Evidence and Discretional Evaluation of Evidence
CAO Kai. Research of the Conception of Legal Evidence and Discretional Evaluation of Evidence[J]. Journal of Henan Public Security Academy, 2007, 16(4): 66-68
Authors:CAO Kai
Abstract:System of legal evidence and doctrine of discretional evaluation of evidence are two important systems of evidence,but scholars hold different opinions on the conception of the two systems.This paper begins with historical view to find the real conception of legal evidence and discretional evaluation of evidence are the two sides of "the estimating method of the weight of evidence and the provision of standard of evidence",and based on those above it states the opinion of myself about the choose of mode of evidence.
Keywords:Legal evidence  Discretional evaluation of evidence  Mode of evidence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号