共谋共同正犯论

在实行行为与共犯理论实质化思潮影响之下,日本刑法对共谋共同正犯的争论早已由"是否当罚"转为"如何处罚"的问题。在我国研究共谋共同正犯,有助于构建精细化的正犯与共犯区别理论,实现对主犯核心共犯体系的反思,并推动我国犯罪论体系阶层化的前行。对共谋共同正犯的成立,应从客观上对其条件进行细化,以尽量限定其处罚范围。二人以上共谋事实的存在,是其责任要件;实行的必要性及共谋者对实行行为的实质分担性,是其客观违法要件。共谋共同正犯实行部分行为全部责任的法理;实行者既遂时,共谋共同正犯亦应负既遂罪责任;共谋共同正犯具有独立的被处罚性。承认共谋共同正犯概念,是对实行行为扩大解释的结果,并不违反罪刑法定原则。

A Discussion on Collusive Co-Principal Offender

Under the influence of the theory of act of perpetrating and accomplice,the controversy concerning joint principal offender has already transferred from "whether to punish" to "how to punish".Researching collusive co-principal offender in China will contribute to refine the theory of principal and the accomplice difference theory,review China's principal as the core point of accomplice system,and develop the stratification of criminal theory system.With regard to the establishment of collusive co-principal offender,it is necessary to refine its conditions in order to limit the scope of punishment as far as possible.The existence of collusive facts will be the requirements of liability;the existence of illegal acts and crime-shared facts will be the requisites to constitute an offense.The principle of collusive co-principal offender is that they will be fully responsible for their sectional conduct.Acknowledging the concept of collusive co-principal offender is the result of amplified interpretation of the act of perpetrating,and this does not violate the principle of legality.