首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

市场与管制的迷思——兼论我国社会保障基金的运营及其监管
引用本文:冯果,柴瑞娟. 市场与管制的迷思——兼论我国社会保障基金的运营及其监管[J]. 现代法学, 2008, 30(1): 43-50
作者姓名:冯果  柴瑞娟
作者单位:武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:社会保障基金大案频发凸显了我国社会保障基金政府主导运营模式的弊端、严格限制投资立法的欠科学性和监管环节的薄弱。面对学界要求社会保障基金市场化的呼声,实现严格监管下的投资开禁、引导基金运营的市场化和专业化以及强化监管力量是解决当下社会保障基金困境的现实选择,但"一刀切"的全部市场化倾向并不足取,理性的做法应该是根据社会保障基金的不同类型和特性采取不同的管理和运营模式,即分别交由政府和市场运营。与此同时,鉴于不同的运营模式对监管模式的需求亦存有差异,故在不同的运营模式下,监管模式亦应有第三方监管和行政监管之别。

关 键 词:社会保障基金  运营市场化  投资开禁  监管机构
文章编号:1001-2397(2008)01-0043-08
修稿时间:2007-11-05

Market and Regulation: Operational and Supervisory Models of Social Security Funds in China
FENG Guo,CHAI Rui-juan. Market and Regulation: Operational and Supervisory Models of Social Security Funds in China[J]. Modern Law Science, 2008, 30(1): 43-50
Authors:FENG Guo  CHAI Rui-juan
Abstract:The fact that flagrant cases concerning social security funds are successively reported in China has given prominence to the defects of the operational model which stresses that running of the funds must be under instructions of the government,to over-rigid legal limit of investment and to lack of efficient supervision.Many scholars urge that social security funds should be managed in a market-oriented way.In the present writer's opinion,the recipe for settling the problem is multi-investment under strict supervision,market-oriented operation of the funds and specialized and improved regulation.However,semble that absolute market-orientation is by no means a wise way.Rather,varied regulatory and operational modes should be followed based on the categories and natures of social security funds,where government and market play their part respectively.At the same time,distinct supervision modes,i.e.third party and administrative supervisions,should be followed.
Keywords:social security funds  market-oriented operation  multi-investment  regulatory agency
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号