首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论刑法的正当性
引用本文:汪东升,孙少森. 论刑法的正当性[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2007, 26(4): 102-106
作者姓名:汪东升  孙少森
作者单位:1. 中共开封市委党校,法学教研室,河南,开封,475001
2. 中国青年政治学院,后勤管理办公室,北京,100089
摘    要:报应论与预防论关于刑法正当性的观点都有其片面性:报应论囿于既往的犯罪事实,未考虑刑法的功利因素;预防论只考虑到刑法的功利因素,未顾及刑法对既往犯罪的报应意义,实践中容易夸大刑法的作用,涉及无辜。因此,刑法的正当性应在于报应与预防的对立统一,只有树立这一思想,才能保证在刑法研究和实践中不出偏颇。

关 键 词:刑法  正当性  报应论  预防论
文章编号:1002-8919(2007)04-0102-05
修稿时间:2007-04-02

On the Legitimateness of the Criminal Law
WANG Dong-sheng,SUN Shao-sen. On the Legitimateness of the Criminal Law[J]. Journal of China Youth College for Political Sciences, 2007, 26(4): 102-106
Authors:WANG Dong-sheng  SUN Shao-sen
Abstract:With regard to the legitimateness of the criminal law,both retribution and prevention are one-sided.Retribution is confined to precedent criminal facts without concern for the utility of the criminal law.On the contrary,prevention takes into account only the utility of the criminal law without concerning the punishment of precedent crimes and overestimates the criminal law in practice,apt to get in touch with the innocent.Consequently,the legitimateness of the criminal law should be settled in line with the unity of opposites.Only in this way can the criminal law be impartial both in theory and in practice.
Keywords:criminal law  legitimateness  retribution  prevention
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号