规范论视野中的刑罚合法性——读帕夫利克教授的报应主义

在Pawlik教授看来,刑法中真正的不法是指公民违反了对社会共同体的忠诚义务,刑罚正是通过确证享有自由与履行忠诚义务之间关联性,将法作为法进行恢复,因而它本质上是一种报应.这对国内刑法学的最大的启发,不是要在犯罪论上以“公民的不法”来缩减不法与罪责的区分,而是要在刑罚论上强调报应主义的取向,因为预防犯罪是刑罚执行或刑罚实现后的效果,并且不确定、不可证,它不是施加刑罚时所能决定的,也就不能作为刑罚的合法性根据.

On Penalty Validity in the Vision of Standardization Theory

Professor Pawlik thought the real illegal referred to the citizens in violation of the loyalty duty to the community, the penalty can be confirmed by the relevance between fi＇ee and perform the duty loyalty, and finally can be recovered by law because it is essentially a kind of retribution. Tile largest inspiration of crimirlal law is not to reduce the difference between the “illegal” and the crime in the criminal theory, but to emphasize the orientation of the retribution in the punishment theory. Therefore, the crime prevention is the result of penalty or punishmeut, and it is not decided by the penalty, and also cannot be legal penalty accordance.