| 我国立法型听证的现状及对策 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王惠玲. 我国立法型听证的现状及对策[J]. 法律科学, 2006, 24(5): 141-148 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王惠玲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院法学研究所 北京 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 立法型听证是目前最受人们关注,也是问题最多的听证。立法型听证的理想功效是促进政府公共决策的民主、公正和科学,提高政府的合法性。而我国立法型听证制度实施的实际效果与理想功效之间差距很大。为提高立法型听证的实效,我们应改变观念,完善听证参加人的遴选机制,提高代表人代表民意、反映民意的能力,提高听证案卷对决策机关的拘束作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 立法型听证 理想功效 现状 对策 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-6914(2006)05-0141-(08) |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-04-03 |
The Actuality of the Argument- type Hearing in China and the Countermeasures |
| |
| Wang Hui-ling. The Actuality of the Argument- type Hearing in China and the Countermeasures[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2006, 24(5): 141-148 |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Hui-ling |
| |
| Affiliation: | Wang Hui - ling |
| |
| Abstract: | At present, the argument - type hearing in China is in an impenetrable difficulty, and it has drawn the public more attention. The ideal effect of the argument - type hearing is to improve democracy, justice and science of the police, to promote the legitimacy of the government. However, there are gap between the actual and ideal effect in China. In order to raise the effect of the argument - type hearing, we should take some measures. Firstly, we must change old attitude. Secondly, perfect the selection system of the agent. Thirdly, improve the agents' abilities of representing the public opinion. Lastly, reinforce the binding force of the hearing documents to the policy makers. |
| |
| Keywords: | argument-type hearing ideal effect actuality countermeasures |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
