首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

沉默权的微观分析——以诉讼程序为视角
引用本文:孔庆余,李广侠.沉默权的微观分析——以诉讼程序为视角[J].江西公安专科学校学报,2005(1):77-81.
作者姓名:孔庆余  李广侠
作者单位:1. 华东政法学院,上海,200042
2. 中国政法大学,北京,100088
摘    要:从宏观上看,沉默权属完政视野下的人权保障问题,但从微观上看,沉默权又不能不关涉诉讼程序问题.从诉讼程序的视角,我国当前是否应当确立沉默权之争实质上是诉讼公正与诉讼效率孰优孰先之争.因此,只有正确把握诉讼公正与诉讼效率关系,才能正确对待沉默权.对于诉讼公正与诉讼效率之关系的解读,应遵循位阶排序、综合考量、利弊权衡和社会发展原则.虽然移植一项制度容易,但移植一制度的精神与气质却难,所以,沉默权的确立应是一个渐进式的过程.结合我国目前的国情及社会形势分析,我国暂不宜确立沉默权.

关 键 词:沉默权  诉讼公正  诉讼效率
文章编号:1008-8121(2005)01-0077-05
修稿时间:2004年10月28

Microscopic Analyses of Mute
KONG Qing-yu,LI Guang-xia.Microscopic Analyses of Mute[J].Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College,2005(1):77-81.
Authors:KONG Qing-yu  LI Guang-xia
Institution:KONG Qing-yu1,LI Guang-xia 2
Abstract:From the macroscopic point, mute belongs to the problem of human right protection. But from the microscopic point,mute also involves the problem of litigation procedure. From the viewpoint of litigation procedure, virtually, whether we should estsblish mute or not is the discussion between litigation justice and litigation efficience. So only grasping the relationship between the litigation justice and litigation effieience, can we treat mute correctly. To understand the relationship between litigation justice and litigation efficience, we should follow the rules of place order, comprehensive investigation,judging advantages and disadvantages and social development. It is easy to transplant a system, but it is difficult to transplant its spirt and disposition. Our country should gradually establish mute system.
Keywords:mute  litigation justice  litigation efficience
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号