| 论刑事鉴定的启动权 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐磊,杨发明. 论刑事鉴定的启动权[J]. 四川警官高等专科学校学报, 2004, 16(2): 73-77 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐磊 杨发明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学法学院，四川大学法学院 四川成都 610068，四川成都 610068 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事鉴定启动机制大体分为分为司法官启动制和当事人启动制。二者各有利弊。我国的刑事鉴定启动机制的建立应结合我国的文化传统、法治环境、刑事政策、司法资源等因素,从我国的实际出发,建立以当事人主义为基调,结合职权主义并引入司法审查的综合启动机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事鉴定 司法官启动制 当事人启动制 综合式启动制 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-8410(2004)02-0073-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-11-17 |
On the starting right of criminal identification |
| |
| TANG Lei,YANG Qi-ming. On the starting right of criminal identification[J]. , 2004, 16(2): 73-77 |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Lei YANG Qi-ming |
| |
| Abstract: | The criminal identification starting system has the judicial officer starting system and the party starting system. They have advantages and disadvantages each other. We must establish the synthetical identification system. Namely combine with cultural tradition, environment of rule by law, criminal policy, judicial resources, according to the Chinese reality, at the basic of partism, integrate functions or powers doctrine, and lead into judicial examination. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal identification starting system party system synthetical strary system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
