首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

简析美国警察非法搜查第三人取得证据的效力
引用本文:刘立霞,张晶. 简析美国警察非法搜查第三人取得证据的效力[J]. 时代法学, 2008, 6(5): 95-102
作者姓名:刘立霞  张晶
作者单位:燕山大学文法学院,河北,秦皇岛,066004;燕山大学文法学院,河北,秦皇岛,066004
摘    要:警察非法搜查第三人取得的证据是否具有证据能力,有关这个问题美国的实务界和理论界给出了不同的答案。目前美国联邦法院在处理这个问题时采用的是“隐私期待”标准,基本上倾向于“有效说”。但美国联邦法院的做法也存在着自身的缺陷,建议采用完善后的“限制无效说”。

关 键 词:非法搜查第三人  当事人适格  美国宪法第四修正案  证据能力

The Analysis about the Effect of the Police Illegally Search the Third People to Obtain the Proof in The United States
LIU LI-xia,ZHANG Jing. The Analysis about the Effect of the Police Illegally Search the Third People to Obtain the Proof in The United States[J]. Presentday Law Science, 2008, 6(5): 95-102
Authors:LIU LI-xia  ZHANG Jing
Affiliation:LIU LI-xia,ZHANG Jing(School of Humanities,Law,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao,Hebei 066004,China)
Abstract:The evidences which the police illegally search the third people to obtain whether have the ability of the proof or not , the answers are different in the practice and the theory in the United States. Currently the American federal court adopt the privacy expectation standard while handle this problem and incline to the effective theory basically, but the way of the United States has the shortage of itself too. Suggest adopting the perfecter restricted invalid theory .
Keywords:illegally search the third people  the qualification of the party  the Fourth Amendment of American constitution  the ability of the proof  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号