论羁押审查方式

羁押是法院作出生效有罪判决之前剥夺人身自由最严重的措施,关涉犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的基本权利,且与无罪推定原则存在高度紧张关系。因此,世界各国和地区大都对羁押采取严格的程序控制。羁押审查方式是羁押审查程序的基本构成要素。域外一般都采取听审或者讯问的方式进行羁押审查。我国的羁押审查采取何种形式,法律没有明确规定。最高人民检察院要求检察机关审查批准逮捕应当讯问嫌疑人,并听取辩护人的意见,但缺少诉讼化的程序保障,实践中难以切实维护犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益,保证羁押决定的程序公正。因此,应当借鉴域外的立法经验,结合我国的实际情况,从立法上明确我国的羁押审查应采取不公开的听审方式,并建立审查机关、申请机关和嫌疑人及其辩护人三方参与的羁押审查程序。

On the Way Custody Review

Custody is a court conviction before the entry into force of the most serious deprivation of liberty of measures concerned with the suspect,the defendant＇s fundamental rights,and with a high degree of tension between the presumption of innocence exists.Therefore,most of the countries and regions to adopt strict detention program control.Approach is detained in custody review the basic elements of the review process.Extraterritorial generally take the hearing or detention review interrogation manner.Our review of what form of custody,the law does not clearly defined.Supreme People＇s Procuratorate for examination and approval required prosecutors to arrest a suspect should be questioned,and listened to the views of counsel,but the lack of action of the procedural safeguards,in practice difficult to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights of criminal suspects,to ensure fairness of procedures for custody decisions.Therefore,the legislation should learn from foreign experience,combined with China＇s actual situation,clear from the legislative review of our custody hearing should be taken not open manner and to establish the review authority for authority and suspects and their counsel tripartite review of Cheng Xu Shen Yu＇s detention structure.