关于我国反垄断立法的再思考 |
| |
引用本文: | 王为农. 关于我国反垄断立法的再思考[J]. 中国法学, 2004, 0(3): 103-112 |
| |
作者姓名: | 王为农 |
| |
作者单位: | 中南大学法学院 |
| |
摘 要: | 本文认为,反垄断法的目的在于维护"公正且自由"的市场竞争秩序、确保市场能充分地发挥其机制作用、合理和效率性地配置有限的社会资源。因此,在立法上应建立起统一的"违法性"判断标准和专一的执法体制;而在规制模式的选择上,应以"行为规制"为主,"消极防御式"的结构性规制手段为辅;以"年度的销售总额"为基准设定较为适宜的法定"规模要件",作为"事前申报制度"的基础;而以反垄断法来规制"行政垄断"只能说是权宜之计,这一问题的解决有待于行政体制改革的深化;我国的反垄断执法机构应是"行政型"的,其特殊的执法程序应法定。
|
关 键 词: | 反垄断立法 行为规制 集中规制 行政垄断 |
A legal Reflection on China's Anti- monopoly Legislation |
| |
Abstract: | This article demonstrates that an antimonopoly law is enacted to safeguard "fair and free" competition order of the market and to assure of the full function of the market mechanism in distributing and allocating limited social resources reasonably and efficiently. Therefore, we shall, legislatively, set up general principles of the "illegality" judgment and special law enforcement system. In deciding the mode of regulating monopoly, we shall set up rules mainly against "behavioral monopoly or monopolization" with passive "structural monopoly" control serves as the subsidiary. Moreover, "Pre - merger Notification" shall be based on the appropriate "Size of parties or transactions", which is always determined on the basis of "annual sales volume". An antimonopoly law can only be taken as an expedience for "administrative monopoly". The final resolution of administrative monopoly hangs upon the further reform of ad ministerial system. Finally, we advocate that China's antimonopoly agency should be "administrative Model" not "Law Enforcement Model" and the special enforcement procedure shall be set in law. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|