Buffalo tales: interest group policy stories in Greater Yellowstone |
| |
Authors: | Mark K McBeth Elizabeth A Shanahan Paul L Hathaway Linda E Tigert Lynette J Sampson |
| |
Institution: | (1) Idaho State University, Stop 8319, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;(2) Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA;(3) Jacksonsville State University, Jacksonville, AL, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Wicked policy problems—those that resist resolution and continuously cycle through different administrative jurisdictions—are
time-consuming for the practitioner and expensive. In these wicked policy environs, interest group narratives contribute to
this intractability through the continued construction of a policy loser’s tale. Central to our study is the analysis of group
maturation with that of policy narrative elements. We explore whether there is a relationship between lobby tactics, financial
resources, and professionalization of authorship of narratives and policy narrative elements. We content analyze the policy
stories of the Buffalo Field Campaign (BFC) over a 10-year period (1999–2008), using the Yellowstone National Park bison and
brucellosis controversy as case material and track how this new interest group’s fundamental policy story has changed over
the course of its lifespan. As demonstrated through their choice of lobby tactics, the group does evolve from an unconventional
to a conventional interest group, with two out of three of their constructed policy beliefs remaining unchanged and their
political tactics consistently focusing on spinning the loser’s tale aimed at expanding the policy arena. Suggestions on the
importance of this work to scientists, administrators, and academics are included. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|